<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Editrix reviews BRIDE AND PREJUDICE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://austenblog.com/2005/02/11/the-editrix-reviews-bride-and-prejudice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://austenblog.com/2005/02/11/the-editrix-reviews-bride-and-prejudice/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:21:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mags</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2005/02/11/the-editrix-reviews-bride-and-prejudice/#comment-20589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mags]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 04:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=476#comment-20589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Darcy is very handsome and rather more outgoing than we are accustomed to, but honey, wait till you see Mr. Bingley standing on a balcony with his shirt hanging wiiiiide open. Mmmm mmmm mmmmm! I was looking around for bricks with which to smash my head, but alas, none were handy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darcy is very handsome and rather more outgoing than we are accustomed to, but honey, wait till you see Mr. Bingley standing on a balcony with his shirt hanging wiiiiide open. Mmmm mmmm mmmmm! I was looking around for bricks with which to smash my head, but alas, none were handy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeaSpot</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2005/02/11/the-editrix-reviews-bride-and-prejudice/#comment-20588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SeaSpot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 04:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=476#comment-20588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Martin Henderson is a terrific Darcy: tall and handsome, unthinkingly snobbish in the beginning and revealing himself as a warm and caring brother and romantic partner as the film progresses.&quot;

This sounds promising, I must say.....:thud:, but then, what is P&amp;P (Bollywood, or no) without a lovely and thuddable Darcy?  After all, it IS the most romantic novel of all time!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Martin Henderson is a terrific Darcy: tall and handsome, unthinkingly snobbish in the beginning and revealing himself as a warm and caring brother and romantic partner as the film progresses.&#8221;</p>
<p>This sounds promising, I must say&#8230;..:thud:, but then, what is P&#038;P (Bollywood, or no) without a lovely and thuddable Darcy?  After all, it IS the most romantic novel of all time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mags</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2005/02/11/the-editrix-reviews-bride-and-prejudice/#comment-20587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mags]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=476#comment-20587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wish you could have come with us on Thursday. :-(

My understanding is that it will go into wide release on February 25. There was an article that said it did okay in limited release. It&#039;s only on 32 screens nationwide.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish you could have come with us on Thursday. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My understanding is that it will go into wide release on February 25. There was an article that said it did okay in limited release. It&#8217;s only on 32 screens nationwide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeaSpot</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2005/02/11/the-editrix-reviews-bride-and-prejudice/#comment-20586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SeaSpot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=476#comment-20586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I loved your review!!!

I hope this film gets a wider distribution so that more people can see it.  After reading the Bollywood article in the most recent National Geographic, I&#039;m very intrigued to see this production, and from what I&#039;ve seen of the production stills, the stars are absolutely gorgeous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved your review!!!</p>
<p>I hope this film gets a wider distribution so that more people can see it.  After reading the Bollywood article in the most recent National Geographic, I&#8217;m very intrigued to see this production, and from what I&#8217;ve seen of the production stills, the stars are absolutely gorgeous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mags</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2005/02/11/the-editrix-reviews-bride-and-prejudice/#comment-20585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mags]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=476#comment-20585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m glad you liked it, Julie!

&lt;em&gt;She even looked like P&amp;P2&#039;s Miss Bingley.&lt;/em&gt;

YES! They found the Indian Anna Chancellor! I loved her Burberry plaid bikini and matching visor! :lol:]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you liked it, Julie!</p>
<p><em>She even looked like P&amp;P2&#8242;s Miss Bingley.</em></p>
<p>YES! They found the Indian Anna Chancellor! I loved her Burberry plaid bikini and matching visor! <img src='http://s2.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie P.</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2005/02/11/the-editrix-reviews-bride-and-prejudice/#comment-20584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=476#comment-20584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PS...

&lt;p&gt;I walked up Park Avenue on the way home because the orange curtains are ruining my lovely Central Park and it was too nice a day to deal with commercial streets filled with tourists who don&#039;t know where they are or where they&#039;re headed.

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, the fact that I was headed up Park is significant -- I happened to catch a glance of a plaque giving the name of the doctor whose office I was passing.

&lt;p&gt;The doctor&#039;s name was &quot;Bakshi.&quot;  I got a good chuckle from that!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS&#8230;</p>
<p>I walked up Park Avenue on the way home because the orange curtains are ruining my lovely Central Park and it was too nice a day to deal with commercial streets filled with tourists who don&#8217;t know where they are or where they&#8217;re headed.</p>
<p>Anyway, the fact that I was headed up Park is significant &#8212; I happened to catch a glance of a plaque giving the name of the doctor whose office I was passing.</p>
<p>The doctor&#8217;s name was &#8220;Bakshi.&#8221;  I got a good chuckle from that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie P.</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2005/02/11/the-editrix-reviews-bride-and-prejudice/#comment-20583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=476#comment-20583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just saw it.  I thoroughly enjoyed it.

&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s what I wrote to the friend who &quot;jilted&quot; me:

&lt;p&gt;I went.  And I liked it.

&lt;p&gt;Yes, the song-and-dance numbers were monumentally silly, but those are a staple of Bollywood films, so I accepted them for what they were.  No biggie.  One song in particular was, however, an absolute hoot.  The 4 sisters (there&#039;s no Kitty equivalent) have just met Mr. Kholi (Mr. Collins) and they are, as expected, not impressed.  So they sing about it. In their pajamas. The song, called &quot;No Life Without Wife,&quot; was hilarious.

&lt;p&gt;Unlike MP2, the plot followed P&amp;P almost perfectly (you could tell the writer/director loves the book), even to the extent of having the Mary character do something completely humiliating.  And, of course, her father then embarrasses her further by telling her she&#039;s entertained them enough.  Mr. and Mrs. Bakshi (Bennet) were very good, as are the 4 girls.  The Charlotte character is much prettier than any Charlotte should be, but what the hell.  There were a lot of modernizations of actual P&amp;P dialogue that really worked.  Including a reworking of the opening line, which I thought was a nice touch.

&lt;p&gt;The Caroline Bingley character was interesting.  She could be bitchy, but she could also be sincerely nice. She even looked like P&amp;P2&#039;s Miss Bingley.

&lt;p&gt;And the Lydia character (Lakhi) was an absolute slut.  She bore, I think, an uncanny resemblance to a young Linda Blair.

&lt;p&gt;Yes, it was silly.  Yes, it was over the top.  But I liked it anyway.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw it.  I thoroughly enjoyed it.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I wrote to the friend who &#8220;jilted&#8221; me:</p>
<p>I went.  And I liked it.</p>
<p>Yes, the song-and-dance numbers were monumentally silly, but those are a staple of Bollywood films, so I accepted them for what they were.  No biggie.  One song in particular was, however, an absolute hoot.  The 4 sisters (there&#8217;s no Kitty equivalent) have just met Mr. Kholi (Mr. Collins) and they are, as expected, not impressed.  So they sing about it. In their pajamas. The song, called &#8220;No Life Without Wife,&#8221; was hilarious.</p>
<p>Unlike MP2, the plot followed P&#038;P almost perfectly (you could tell the writer/director loves the book), even to the extent of having the Mary character do something completely humiliating.  And, of course, her father then embarrasses her further by telling her she&#8217;s entertained them enough.  Mr. and Mrs. Bakshi (Bennet) were very good, as are the 4 girls.  The Charlotte character is much prettier than any Charlotte should be, but what the hell.  There were a lot of modernizations of actual P&#038;P dialogue that really worked.  Including a reworking of the opening line, which I thought was a nice touch.</p>
<p>The Caroline Bingley character was interesting.  She could be bitchy, but she could also be sincerely nice. She even looked like P&#038;P2&#8242;s Miss Bingley.</p>
<p>And the Lydia character (Lakhi) was an absolute slut.  She bore, I think, an uncanny resemblance to a young Linda Blair.</p>
<p>Yes, it was silly.  Yes, it was over the top.  But I liked it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mags</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2005/02/11/the-editrix-reviews-bride-and-prejudice/#comment-20581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mags]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2005 01:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=476#comment-20581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was discussing the movie with a co-worker yesterday, and she said she was interested in seeing it because she likes Martin Henderson and Naveen Andrews and her curiosity was piqued by seeing Aishwarya Rai on GMA. She told me she wasn&#039;t that familiar with P&amp;P, and I realized that she might not like it as much as I did. I think a lot of my pleasure in it was the ways that it tied into P&amp;P. Someone who wasn&#039;t interested in that angle might not like it as much. But I thought the musical numbers were fun. &quot;Dola Dola&quot; (the one with the sticks) was a fantastic piece of choreography.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was discussing the movie with a co-worker yesterday, and she said she was interested in seeing it because she likes Martin Henderson and Naveen Andrews and her curiosity was piqued by seeing Aishwarya Rai on GMA. She told me she wasn&#8217;t that familiar with P&amp;P, and I realized that she might not like it as much as I did. I think a lot of my pleasure in it was the ways that it tied into P&amp;P. Someone who wasn&#8217;t interested in that angle might not like it as much. But I thought the musical numbers were fun. &#8220;Dola Dola&#8221; (the one with the sticks) was a fantastic piece of choreography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robin</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2005/02/11/the-editrix-reviews-bride-and-prejudice/#comment-20582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=476#comment-20582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OMG, just read the review in the NYT.  It is so bad, I&#039;d have to say the reviewer has some hidden agenda.  I&#039;m guessing she dismisses  any attempt at crossover as degrading the original genre (in this case the Indian cinema.)
If I was feeling uncharitable, I&#039;d say it just confirms how provincial and out of touch the New York press is.  Or that they employ too many anglophobe bigots.
Specifically, she pans the music and choreography.  ...&quot;clumsy song-and-dance numbers&quot; etc. I think this review (Manohla Dargis in the NYT, Feb 11) tells me more about the reviewer than the film.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG, just read the review in the NYT.  It is so bad, I&#8217;d have to say the reviewer has some hidden agenda.  I&#8217;m guessing she dismisses  any attempt at crossover as degrading the original genre (in this case the Indian cinema.)<br />
If I was feeling uncharitable, I&#8217;d say it just confirms how provincial and out of touch the New York press is.  Or that they employ too many anglophobe bigots.<br />
Specifically, she pans the music and choreography.  &#8230;&#8221;clumsy song-and-dance numbers&#8221; etc. I think this review (Manohla Dargis in the NYT, Feb 11) tells me more about the reviewer than the film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie P.</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2005/02/11/the-editrix-reviews-bride-and-prejudice/#comment-20580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2005 02:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=476#comment-20580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The papers here in NYC absolutely &lt;i&gt;panned&lt;/i&gt; it.  The reviews are so bad that I am forced to attend by myself because the person I was going to go with now doesn&#039;t want to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The papers here in NYC absolutely <i>panned</i> it.  The reviews are so bad that I am forced to attend by myself because the person I was going to go with now doesn&#8217;t want to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

