Skip to content

"It proved twice as fine as the first report"

March 3, 2007

The Telegraph has an extensive article on the filming of Persuasion 2007, including a photo of Louisa lying on the cobblestones and Captain Wentworth looking rather like he’s about to sprinkle her with holy water and give her last rites. We suspect they have not shouted “Action” yet; looks like they’re all standing around “enjoying the sight of a dead young lady.” It’s a good article in that it tells us a lot more about the film than we have heard previously–for good or ill.

The director, Adrian Shergold – acclaimed, paradoxically, for his gritty dramas (Low Winter Sun, The Last Hangman) – is preparing the actors for a performance intended to incorporate both subtle, comic farce and Anne’s unspoken sadness at how she allowed herself to be talked out of following her heart. In the scene about to be filmed, her father, Mr Elliot (Anthony Head), will be at his most sycophantic, genuflecting at the feet of Lady Dalrymple, and whisking Anne away from Wentworth in what is yet another missed opportunity for her to right the mistakes of her past.

Oh, that should be good.

‘The joy of making this for me,’ Shergold says, looking at the flickering candlelight, the silk costumes and the flamboyant hair pieces, ‘is the beauty of it. There are no guns, no blood and gore – Bath is such a beautiful city.’

It is indeed.

ITV’s Austen season, comprising three new adaptations, of which Persuasion is one. (The other two are Mansfield Park and Northanger Abbey and there will also be, somewhat oddly, a re-run of an old version of Sense and Sensibility.)

Pssst….rerun of Emma. S&S is new and later and the BBC. See here.

The idea behind the season is to provide the public with three beautifully made films, presented as a package. ‘I think Jane Austen, more than anything, is worth revisiting,’ Mackie says. ‘They really are boy-meets-girl love stories like Bridget Jones.”

Coming from one of the ITV commissioners, that explains SO much.

Securing Hawkins gave Shergold the confidence to concentrate on telling the story from Anne’s perspective (principally, the film looks at her regret at how she was coerced to reject Wentworth’s marriage proposal).

Hmmm.

‘This was such an interesting project because of Adrian’s involvement,’ Penry-Jones says. ‘Also, Wentworth is a great role. You get talked about for the first third of the story and then you appear and all you have to do is stand there and not trip over the furniture, really. You can’t get away from the Austen stereotype of the tortured brooding hero because that is what Wentworth is, but he does his best to cover it up and then suddenly he is thrust together with a woman who broke his heart.’

What stereotype? What brooding? We’re inclined to like you, Rupert. Don’t blow it by being unnecessarily defensive.

For Hawkins, the experience of playing an Austen heroine has been profound. She absorbed herself in Austen’s life, reading her letters and drinking in the sadness that came at the end during Austen’s illness and death aged 41.

Again with the letters! Though this is not necessarily such a bad thing. We guess education is better than abject ignorance. But we hope Miss Hawkins similarly immersed herself in the novel.

There are the requisite elements of Anne’s family’s snobbery, but these are treated with subtlety. Anne is always at the centre. ‘We’ve locked the cameras right up on their faces,’ Shergold says. ‘I’ve done lots of diary scenes where [Anne] looks up to the camera, to the audience, including them in her thoughts. That kind of filming breaks every rule in the book, but we wanted to give it the intensity.’

There–someone was wondering about the closeups of Sally staring into the camera.

Two weeks later, conditions on the Cobb at Lyme Regis are treacherous. Like Bath, the Cobb has a key role in the novel. There has never been any question of shooting elsewhere, be it safer or easier. Yesterday, for instance, Shergold shot a scene starring Penry-Jones in which the waves smashed over the top of the wall and drenched him. ‘We carried on,’ Shergold says, ‘and I think everybody loved that. They thought I’d call a stop to filming. I’ve no idea if I can use it but it was great fun. I had to stop in the end because the safety people said we’d all be washed away.’

We like his attitude! Really, the locations are there and need little more than aggressive tourist-wrangling to make them work.

A vast crashmat is placed beneath the wall and the stunt woman is in place: ‘Louisa, Louisa!’ Hawkins screams as the cameras roll, managing to infuse two words with blood curdling fear.

Ooooh!

Earlier, Shergold and Hawkins had improvised together a quiet scene of her looking out to sea, a possible ending to the film, different from both the script and the book. Shergold is, as yet, undecided about how to end the film. ‘I have three or four endings at the moment,’ he says, ‘and that’s the joy of it for me. This is nothing to do with Jane Austen. If I can shoot anything that tells the story, then I will.’

As long as it tells the story.

Without wanting to give anything away, in the scripted version, Anne’s reward is even more than her man, a bonanza payoff that has no foundation in Austen’s novel. ‘I’m not worried about that,’ Penry-Jones says. ‘If these Austen people had their way, this film would be five hours long. We’ve got to use a bit of artistic licence.’

“These Austen people?” In the immortal words of Lena Lamont, we ain’t people! We are your target audience! (Aren’t we? Sometimes we wonder.)

The film is beautiful, much more like an independent European film than the pretty, sundrenched versions we have come to associate with British costume dramas. The dark scene in which Penry-Jones gets drenched, for example, has made it. And the ending? Well, it is television, after all.

Hmmmmmmmmmmm.

Leave a Comment
  1. Sylvia M. permalink
    March 3, 2007 1:21 pm

    Very interesting aricle! Thank you! I can tell this is going to be quite different from P2 or P1, but will probably be just as good.

    Good for Sally Hawkins! She has read Jane’s letters and tried to copy her sadness at the end of her life. I’m glad she has taken that much care for her part. Let’s hope she’s read the book too.

    A drenched Wentworth?! I know it was accidental, but it got left in. I wonder how many of these other Austen films will follow the example of Mr. Darcy in P&P2 and have a wet hero? :)

    Hmmm….didn’t the book say that there was no blood at all when Louisa fell? Wasn’t it all internal? Ahh….I looked it up and found the quote.

    “There was no wound, no blood, no visible bruise; but her eyes were closed, she breathed not, her face was like death.”

  2. Kathleen permalink
    March 3, 2007 1:46 pm

    >>‘They really are boy-meets-girl love stories like Bridget Jones.”
    I read this line this morning in the paper and just groaned. Do they ever even bother to read the books?

    >>Without wanting to give anything away, in the scripted version, Anne’s reward is even more than her man, a bonanza payoff that has no foundation in Austen’s novel.

    Bonanza? What would that be? She marries Mr Elliot, becomes Mistresso of Kellynch Hall and keeps Wentworth on as a toy-boy? And, even though I am one of those ‘Austen People’, I don’t understand why everything has to be condensed to two hours to please the masses, since tons of people tune on to ‘historical drama’ miniseries or two parters on the telly.

  3. Ina permalink
    March 3, 2007 2:05 pm

    I don’t think the condensation has as much to do with pleasing the masses, as pleasing the studio and network execs who are allergic to risk.

  4. Chantel permalink
    March 3, 2007 2:27 pm

    Have to laugh a bit at Rupert P-J’s reference to “these Austen people” who would like the movie 5 hours long. He sounds like he’s been hounded a bit. :D But, like Mags said, you don’t really want to estrange us, Rupert, my boy, we are the ones who are going to make or break this film.

    But Rupert’s moodiness is not going to deter me, unless he keeps going on that track, b/c I’m really looking forward to Sally Hawkins’ Anne. Even more now that I read that article–she read Jane’s last letters and stuff, that’s a good sign.

  5. AmandaJ permalink
    March 3, 2007 3:41 pm

    I am convinced that Sally Hawkins is going to make a wonderful Anne, based on her previous performances, and what I’ve seen in the trailer. She is a very intelligent actor, and has the most expressive eyes.

    I hope the ending is going to be in the spirit of the novel. I very much see adaptations of novels as interpretations – you can’t exactly replicate a novel to another medium, but I want it to follow the story, and changes to be within the spirit of the original, and true to the characters. It’s one reason why I completely accepted the end of P2, with Wentworth and Anne gazing out at sea from his ship, and felt that the ‘American ending’ of P&P2005 was plain silly. Stay true to the charcters at least people!

  6. Jessica Irene permalink
    March 3, 2007 4:00 pm

    Not to nit-pick, but it was not Anne’s father Sir Walter that “banned” the early love with Wentworth, but Lady Russell who strongly persuaded her against it….

    I would not at all mind being one of those tourists who “suddenly find themselves bang in the middle of the film set of Persuasion”…even if they are herded through….

  7. Sylvia M. permalink
    March 3, 2007 5:28 pm

    I wonder if they make Wentworth get the title of Baronet in the end for the big payoff they talk about. Then Anne would be be Lady Wentworth and come out the best of everyone in the end. It is suggested by Mary in the book. I would be very well satisfied if this were the case.

    Anne had no Uppercross Hall before her, no landed estate, no headship of a family; and if they could but keep Captain Wentworth from being made a baronet, she would not change situations with Anne.

  8. Sylvia L. permalink
    March 3, 2007 6:45 pm

    He did not say “middle aged Austen whores”. That must count something. ;)
    Looking forward it nevertheless.

  9. Sandra A. permalink
    March 3, 2007 6:49 pm

    ‘These Austen people’…*cringe* I must say that despite the ‘no dry eye in the house’ at the end of the article, Rupert here is not winning me over, nor with his ‘brooding hero’ line. Really, I hope he’s at least *read* the novel. Other than that, I’m very excited to see ITV’s new adaptations. We are supposed to be getting them in November here in the States, no?

  10. March 3, 2007 9:57 pm

    I loved the 90′s film version of “Persuasion” and have been very skeptical that this new version would be nearly as lovely. Amanda Root was exquisite!
    However, the articles posted on Austenblog have been so positive- I am now anxious to see it!
    I only hope that no Italian circus parade marches through the streets as Wentworth and Anne finally come to an understanding! That was so jarring to the senses…

  11. LauraGrace permalink
    March 3, 2007 10:57 pm

    I, of course, haven’t seen it yet, but I have great respect for the people behind it from this article! It seems they see it’s all about the story and the thought and the characters. Bravo!

    And I really don’t mind about the blood. It’s a change that’s not out of the spirit of the book.

  12. marcyg68 permalink
    March 3, 2007 10:58 pm

    >>”‘I’ve done lots of diary scenes where [Anne] looks up to the camera, to the audience, including them in her thoughts. That kind of filming breaks every rule in the book, but we wanted to give it the intensity.’”
    This worries me a bit. Is Anne going to be ‘talking’ or making faces at the camera? I’m not a fan of this style of filming and I hope it won’t pull the audience out of the story. I don’t mind scenes where the character writes in a diary or writes a letter (a la Emma’s diary-writing in Gwyneth Paltrow’s version or Margaret Hale writing to her cousin in North & South). But when the character starts talking to the camera, then it just becomes distracting to me.

    >>”For two hours, the audience sits spellbound…”
    A good sign. I am one of those ‘Austen people’ who would have preferred a 5-hour adaptation, but two hours is much better than the 1 1/2 hours we’ve heard of in earlier reports. There is much to cover here so I can see why they’ve chosen to focus on making this “Anne’s story” – however, I hope they wont short-change other secondary characters as a result. I’m hopeful that characters like Sir Walter, Elizabeth, the Crofts and the Musgroves won’t just seem like one-dimensional characters or that important scenes from the book are cut.

    I’m curious to see what they’ve chosen to do with the ending. I hope it’s not something that is a total change from the spirit of the book.

  13. Julie B. permalink
    March 4, 2007 7:25 pm

    Penry-Jones is drenched by waves.

    [stops breathing]

    I’m sorry, Jane who?

    Why yes, I am shallow. Why do you ask?

  14. Penny M. permalink
    March 5, 2007 3:48 pm

    I’m very excited, but a little frightened…Capt. Wentworth is my all time favourite sexy hero, and one who only ‘Austen people’ know about.

    It was about time someone remade this and introduced him to the world…….but I saw him first!

  15. Cindy R permalink
    March 5, 2007 4:15 pm

    I saw brief mention of this adaptation coming to the States in the fall. Anyone know for sure? I am about to die of envy since most of you will get to see it so soon. Ahhhh… who doesn’t love a military man???

  16. Mags via her Treo permalink
    March 5, 2007 4:29 pm

    *sigh*

    http://www.austenblog.com/archives/2007/02/23/four-new-jane-austen-adaptations-to-be-broadcast-in-us-in-november-2007/

    Military men are nice. Sailors are better. :-D

  17. Cindy R permalink
    March 5, 2007 9:09 pm

    Thank you! Thank you! I am already plotting how I can get a region 2 dvd to play…and if all else fails, I’ll be glued to PBS the month of November…but oh so long to wait for another Captain Wentworth sighting!

  18. Ina permalink
    March 6, 2007 9:49 pm

    Cindy, you are lucky. I don’t get PBS and a region 2 player is out of the question for me. I have to wait til Netflix and/or Amazon pick these up. *sigh*

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 155 other followers