<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speaking of wet shirts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://austenblog.com/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://austenblog.com/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:21:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen L</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30602</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karen L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.austenblog.com/archives/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to mention that Oliver Mellors &#039;do...or undo, as the case may be.  Bean and his hair were the only things that saved that castastrophe known as &quot;Scarlett&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention that Oliver Mellors &#8216;do&#8230;or undo, as the case may be.  Bean and his hair were the only things that saved that castastrophe known as &#8220;Scarlett&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surreyhill</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[surreyhill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 02:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.austenblog.com/archives/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think my vote for Worst!Hair!Ever! in an Austen Adaptation HAS to go to Ewan McGregor in  the Gwyneth &quot;Emma&quot;.

Sean Bean isn&#039;t really an Austen guy. I see him as more of a Bronte fellow.

NTTAWWT.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think my vote for Worst!Hair!Ever! in an Austen Adaptation HAS to go to Ewan McGregor in  the Gwyneth &#8220;Emma&#8221;.</p>
<p>Sean Bean isn&#8217;t really an Austen guy. I see him as more of a Bronte fellow.</p>
<p>NTTAWWT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcia</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.austenblog.com/archives/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sean Bean is a sacred and beautiful thing regardless; Sharpe mullet, Middle Earth mop, or whatever.

But getting back to Austen film adaptations (did Sean ever do an Austen adaptation?  Why not forgoodnessake?), as far as Elinor and Marianne are concerned with the latest S&amp;S, the debate seems to be forming along the same old lines as with Ang Lee&#039;s S&amp;S (or in other similar circumstances for that matter).  I can certainly see the attraction of Charity Wakefield&#039;s or Kate Winslet&#039;s Marianne.  Bedazzling and immediately compelling for sure.  But Elinor as Hattie Morahan or Emma Thompson do far more for me from the get go.  There&#039;s a quiet elegance and depth there that&#039;s not necessarily readily apparent unless you&#039;re attuned to it.  Something that you immediately sense will take some work and time to delve into to full appreciate.  And that&#039;s just hawt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean Bean is a sacred and beautiful thing regardless; Sharpe mullet, Middle Earth mop, or whatever.</p>
<p>But getting back to Austen film adaptations (did Sean ever do an Austen adaptation?  Why not forgoodnessake?), as far as Elinor and Marianne are concerned with the latest S&amp;S, the debate seems to be forming along the same old lines as with Ang Lee&#8217;s S&amp;S (or in other similar circumstances for that matter).  I can certainly see the attraction of Charity Wakefield&#8217;s or Kate Winslet&#8217;s Marianne.  Bedazzling and immediately compelling for sure.  But Elinor as Hattie Morahan or Emma Thompson do far more for me from the get go.  There&#8217;s a quiet elegance and depth there that&#8217;s not necessarily readily apparent unless you&#8217;re attuned to it.  Something that you immediately sense will take some work and time to delve into to full appreciate.  And that&#8217;s just hawt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mags from her Treo</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mags from her Treo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.austenblog.com/archives/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wait a minute wait a minute wait a minute...Sean Bean&#039;s Sharpe!Mullet is a sacred and beautiful thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait a minute wait a minute wait a minute&#8230;Sean Bean&#8217;s Sharpe!Mullet is a sacred and beautiful thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surreyhill</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[surreyhill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.austenblog.com/archives/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ahhhh, Maisy, but Sean Bean is perhaps one of the select few actors who can totally rock the mullet without coming off looking like a guest star on &quot;Saved By the Bell&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhhh, Maisy, but Sean Bean is perhaps one of the select few actors who can totally rock the mullet without coming off looking like a guest star on &#8220;Saved By the Bell&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maisy</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maisy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.austenblog.com/archives/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOL at &quot;Euromullet&quot;!  You&#039;re right...a la Sean Bean&#039;s hair in the Sharpe&#039;s films.

Notwithstanding some of the awful men&#039;s wigs in Emma-1996-TV, I had hoped that the &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; bad hair ended with the 1970&#039;s adaptations...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL at &#8220;Euromullet&#8221;!  You&#8217;re right&#8230;a la Sean Bean&#8217;s hair in the Sharpe&#8217;s films.</p>
<p>Notwithstanding some of the awful men&#8217;s wigs in Emma-1996-TV, I had hoped that the <i>really</i> bad hair ended with the 1970&#8242;s adaptations&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LauraGrace</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LauraGrace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.austenblog.com/archives/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eddie had better stop brooding over Elinor long enough to remove his hand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eddie had better stop brooding over Elinor long enough to remove his hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surreyhill</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[surreyhill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.austenblog.com/archives/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Me.

I see Euromullet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me.</p>
<p>I see Euromullet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maisy</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maisy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.austenblog.com/archives/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, Arwen!  Good eye!

Does anyone else think that Col. Brandon&#039;s hairstyle looks too much like a mullet in that pic?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Arwen!  Good eye!</p>
<p>Does anyone else think that Col. Brandon&#8217;s hairstyle looks too much like a mullet in that pic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chantel</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30597</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chantel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.austenblog.com/archives/2007/09/25/speaking-of-wet-shirts/#comment-30597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forgot to mention that Edward&#039;s hat is reminding me of the unfortunate hat on MP1-Edmund. Not a becoming hat! I &lt;i&gt;know&lt;/i&gt; that&#039;s what clergymen wear, but they screw up on other things, why not this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to mention that Edward&#8217;s hat is reminding me of the unfortunate hat on MP1-Edmund. Not a becoming hat! I <i>know</i> that&#8217;s what clergymen wear, but they screw up on other things, why not this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

