Skip to content

We really shall retire to Bedlam (updated)

October 3, 2007
by

ITV, perpetrator of the Jane Austen Season, has announced that production has begun on a new series called “Lost in Austen.”

Disillusioned with her life in London and her boyfriend, Amanda discovers Elizabeth in her bathroom. Soon she finds herself swapping place with her as she enters the ‘real’ fictional world of Pride And Prejudice, arriving in the home of the Bennet family.

As has been pointed out in comments, it sounds like a rather fun premise, but as we blogged a while back:

We have heard some details about the planned series from a very well-placed source, which unfortunately we are not at liberty to reveal; but from what we have heard, be afraid, Gentle Readers, be very afraid. Of course it’s still very much in pre-production so we may be suffering anticipatory angst in vain, and it will turn out to be the wacky, hilarious modern-girl-meets-Regency romp that The Powers That Be apparently think it is rather than a Mary Sue bad fan fiction trainwreck.

We know that in some quarters we are considered Negative Mags, the snobby purist who ruins everyone’s fun by insisting on quality Jane Austen Brand™ merchandise rather than “good enough” or “close enough” or “better than the other one”; but we repeat that there is no one who would be more delighted than we if this turned out to be something great. Dorothy is writing to Serle for healthy recipes for stewed crow, which we will feast on publicly if Lost in Austen does turn out to be good; and with pleasure, because the enjoyment of a great series will make us very, very happy. But we’re not holding our breath.

Even not considering our bit of inside information, there are a couple of things in the press release that give us pause. One we already mentioned: four episodes. Four one-hour episodes, we understand (probably more like 45-50 minutes with ads, let’s say). That’s a minimum of three hours. We repeat:

ITV gave Northanger Abbey 90 minutes. They gave Persuasion 90 minutes. They callously, viciously, and with extreme prejudice shoehorned Mansfield Park into 90 minutes. And they’re giving this three to four hours.

We think this shows ITV’s attitude toward Jane Austen quite plainly, don’t you?

The other thing that amused us from the press release was a quote from Controller of Drama Commissioning for ITV, Sally Haynes.

“Lost in Austen has the high production values of period drama. Its sumptuous period locations, costume, carriages and props are juxtaposed with Amanda Price’s very modern lifestyle.

“High production values?” “Sumptuous period locations, costume, carriages and props?” This from the network that gave us a claustrophobic Mansfield Park that never moved off the estate, as though it were surrounded with an electrified fence, replaced a ball with a picnic with OUTDOOR DANCING!!!, and had Billie Piper in medieval bodices and her hair looking like she had just got out of bed? And Northanger Abbey with 100 feet of cobblestone and an arch in Dublin appearing as the entire city of Bath, which they apparently seemed to think no Janeite had ever seen? And Persuasion–well, that was a little better, at least they filmed in Bath. Or more properly in various locations along the Royal Crescent. See Anne run from one end of the Royal Crescent! See Anne run from the other end of the Royal Crescent! Can we trust in these “high production values” and “sumptuous period locations, costume, carriages and props?” Or should we be irritated that, again, they’re giving the crappy Mary Sue fan fiction the good stuff after having cheated the real Jane Austen stories?

The cleverness of the script will appeal to Austen aficionados and attract a new audience to this beautiful love story.”

Oh please. Don’t patronize us.

The series will have Jemima Rooper as Amanda, Gemma Arterton as Elizabeth, Elliot Cowan as Darcy, Morven Christie as Jane, Hugh Bonneville as Mr. Bennet, Alex Kingston as Mrs. Bennet, Lindsay Duncan as Lady Catherine de Bourgh; Tom Mison is Mr Bingley, Tom Riley is Captain Wickham, and Christina Cole is Caroline Bingley.

(Captain Wickham? When did Wickham become a captain?)

Meet Mr. Darcy, and here’s an article on Alex Kingston.

Thanks to Alert Janeite Lisa and other parties for the heads-up.

Leave a Comment
  1. Amo permalink
    October 1, 2007 3:25 pm

    wtf?! added this to IMDb last night with the scant info there was (ie i was impressed to find new title). hmm. You know someone said “Lost in austen” sounds too much like a porno…

  2. October 1, 2007 5:25 pm

    So, does the replacement fall in love with Darcy instead? Does Elizabeth fall in love with someone in “real time?” Sounds a little bizarre to me.

  3. Karen L permalink
    October 1, 2007 5:38 pm

    Lindsay Duncan as Lady C is worth a look.

  4. October 1, 2007 8:14 pm

    “Perpetrator of the Jane Austen Season.” Thanks for making me smile at the end of a gloomy day.

  5. October 2, 2007 4:06 am

    My God! How ridiculous can this become? She suddenly ‘finds’ Elizabeth Bennet in her bathroom?! And then suddenly swaps places with her? No, no, no, NO!!!

    A shame they are going to give this the ‘high production values’ they’re speaking about in the article, as they made the 3 new adaptations so very cheapish…

  6. October 2, 2007 5:33 am

    4 chapters!!!

    Just more details, please…If this is a wicked comedy, I hope it’s better than Rozema’s Mansfield Park ;)

    Franka a bath is almost like the car in Back to the Future…;):D:D:D

  7. Allison T. permalink
    October 2, 2007 6:49 am

    Well, this concept of time travel, in which the feisty modern (usually American) heroine shows those dull, stuffy old Brits how to live life to the fullest by plunging their arms into tureens of negus at balls in order to rescue drowning flies and otherwise engaging in period-inappropriate behavior has been done several times in fiction, so why not on the boob (ahem!) tube? Sounds rather fun to me, though as a dance historian I shall be the first to line up with implements of chastisement if they start having the modern heroine teach the Bennet girls the Macarena or something like that.

  8. October 2, 2007 7:36 am

    Sounds a bit of a similar vien as the book ‘Me and Mr Darcy’, which i was sorely disappointed in.
    I shall watch it and reserve judgement until then, but my hopes aren’t high for the idea- though some of teh creative talent behind it looks promising…

  9. October 2, 2007 8:24 am

    Amo, do you have a link to the title at the IMDB? I couldn’t find it.

  10. Sandra permalink
    October 2, 2007 1:40 pm

    Um, I think my head just exploded.

  11. Julia permalink
    October 2, 2007 2:30 pm

    I’m really fed up with “Pride and Prejudice”, “Darcy” and “romance”. At least with the words. Can’t they turn to something else for god’s sake?
    Well, perhaps we should be grateful that just one of the six novels gets all this dubious attention.

  12. Amo permalink
    October 2, 2007 2:46 pm

    Mags, it hasn’t been uploaded yet. New titles take about a week, but there might be some confusion if the company sent them that release. I dunno. But i uploaded it as “inside austen” (i was wrong first time :s – that was the title that inspired porno comparisons), because of this: http://hexfan.proboards28.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1187690600

  13. Laurel Ann permalink
    October 2, 2007 11:21 pm

    I hope that “Lost in Jane Austen”, which it appears does not attempt to disguise itself as ‘truth’ such as the recent disappointment “Becoming Jane”, is in fact a Georgian Fiction Fantasy and not a re-make of the American TV show “Lost in Space” in Georgian influenced space suits! Only time will tell. ;) Warning Will Darcy!

  14. October 3, 2007 12:02 pm

    LOL! ‘Claustrophobic Mansfield Park’ made me giggle! Never read a better description of that production. ;)

  15. Chantel permalink
    October 3, 2007 1:26 pm

    I really like the Macarena idea!! :D that maybe me laugh out loud. This premise doesn’t bode well–it has too great a chance of being Harlequin romance-y.

  16. Sylvia M. permalink
    October 3, 2007 3:01 pm

    Maybe the Mr. Darcy in the Austen world is actually somebody from her real world that is lost in Austen as well. They meet up when she comes back to her real world and fall in love. Elizabeth can then go back to Mr. Darcy where she belongs.

  17. Amo permalink
    October 4, 2007 3:11 pm

    Personally I can’t believe anyone would cast Gemma “Golden Ratio” Arterton, after the ‘controversy’ caused by Knightley (an average-looking star with a heavily managed face/ persona) being ‘too beautiful’…

  18. October 6, 2007 11:50 am

    Sylvia, that’s a good idea! But, we’ll see…because although I don’t like the idea (as I don’t like Macarena ;) ), I know we will finish watching the thing.

  19. Amo permalink
    October 6, 2007 4:44 pm

    Mags, it’s up http://imdb.com/title/tt1117666/ but god knows what’ll happen with it now the title seems to have reverted to the old one.

  20. Amo permalink
    October 9, 2007 7:10 pm

    Hm, Ruby Bentall as Mary, Daniel Percival as ? (I’m thinking Wickham?), and Guy Henry as ? (Mr Gardiner or Sir William ?). Sources:
    *http://www.pfd.co.uk/clients/percivad/a-act.html
    *http://www.citylit.ac.uk/cou_sub_dds_cs.php
    *http://www.hughbonneville.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=148&Itemid=61

  21. Sheryl permalink
    October 18, 2007 4:05 pm

    I admire your Austen purism, Mags. I sleep better at nights just knowing you are ever vigilant.

  22. October 18, 2007 10:10 pm

    LOL, Sheryl! I don’t really think of myself as a purist. I’m just very particular. :-D

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 154 other followers