<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for AustenBlog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://austenblog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://austenblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 03:23:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Edwardian is the new Victorian by Melody/Miss Marianne</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2013/04/19/edwardian-is-the-new-victorian/#comment-43261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melody/Miss Marianne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 03:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austenblog.com/?p=7524#comment-43261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh my word. I am positively appalled. *I* still rather freak out when I see the &quot;Victorian&quot; thing... but then perhaps 4 years in the World of Janeites is not quite enough to desensitize me to that yet. ;) (I get really annoyed at &quot;Georgian&quot;, too, although that seems to happen more often with movie descriptions, I think. Oh, and then &quot;18th century&quot;. But I suppose that&#039;s better than 20th century... good grief!) 

Edwardian, indeed. &quot;Is this to be endured? It shall NOT be!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my word. I am positively appalled. *I* still rather freak out when I see the &#8220;Victorian&#8221; thing&#8230; but then perhaps 4 years in the World of Janeites is not quite enough to desensitize me to that yet. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  (I get really annoyed at &#8220;Georgian&#8221;, too, although that seems to happen more often with movie descriptions, I think. Oh, and then &#8220;18th century&#8221;. But I suppose that&#8217;s better than 20th century&#8230; good grief!) </p>
<p>Edwardian, indeed. &#8220;Is this to be endured? It shall NOT be!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In defense of Persuasion by Citizen Reader</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2013/04/08/in-defense-of-persuasion/#comment-43218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Citizen Reader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austenblog.com/?p=7506#comment-43218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m with you--no humor??!?!? What about the drawing room scene where they&#039;re all laying their problems on poor Anne? Mary lamenting that her kids come home stuffed with cake and Grandma Musgrove lamenting that the only way to keep Mary&#039;s brats in order is to stuff &#039;em with more cake than is good for them. Hilarious--and timely. That could be happening at any family gathering today, which makes Austen&#039;s skill all the more awe-inspiring.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you&#8211;no humor??!?!? What about the drawing room scene where they&#8217;re all laying their problems on poor Anne? Mary lamenting that her kids come home stuffed with cake and Grandma Musgrove lamenting that the only way to keep Mary&#8217;s brats in order is to stuff &#8216;em with more cake than is good for them. Hilarious&#8211;and timely. That could be happening at any family gathering today, which makes Austen&#8217;s skill all the more awe-inspiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Edwardian is the new Victorian by Eileen</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2013/04/19/edwardian-is-the-new-victorian/#comment-43188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eileen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austenblog.com/?p=7524#comment-43188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, Victorian was bad enough.  Edwardian simply cannot be tolerated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Victorian was bad enough.  Edwardian simply cannot be tolerated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Edwardian is the new Victorian by Karin</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2013/04/19/edwardian-is-the-new-victorian/#comment-43182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austenblog.com/?p=7524#comment-43182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am so happy you are back, Mags! You&#039;ve just made me laugh out loud...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so happy you are back, Mags! You&#8217;ve just made me laugh out loud&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Edwardian is the new Victorian by Cinthia</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2013/04/19/edwardian-is-the-new-victorian/#comment-43171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cinthia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 00:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austenblog.com/?p=7524#comment-43171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not the first time nor the last, I&#039;m afraid. For example, just look at the banner designed by Guadalajara&#039;s International Book Fair for the Pride and Prejudice readathon that will take place next Tuesday (April 23) to celebrate World Book Day:

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151382264261443&amp;set=pb.50997736442.-2207520000.1366416366.&amp;type=3&amp;theater

And they did not listened eventhough I pointed out the attirement is from the wrong era. I could almost cry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not the first time nor the last, I&#8217;m afraid. For example, just look at the banner designed by Guadalajara&#8217;s International Book Fair for the Pride and Prejudice readathon that will take place next Tuesday (April 23) to celebrate World Book Day:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151382264261443&#038;set=pb.50997736442.-2207520000.1366416366.&#038;type=3&#038;theater" rel="nofollow">https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151382264261443&#038;set=pb.50997736442.-2207520000.1366416366.&#038;type=3&#038;theater</a></p>
<p>And they did not listened eventhough I pointed out the attirement is from the wrong era. I could almost cry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Edwardian is the new Victorian by Mags</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2013/04/19/edwardian-is-the-new-victorian/#comment-43168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mags]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austenblog.com/?p=7524#comment-43168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meredith, I don&#039;t think I got past &quot;Edwardian authoress,&quot; to be honest. It was like *sound effect of record skipping* and I just sat there thinking, &quot;Edwardian? &lt;i&gt;Edwardian?&lt;/i&gt; &lt;i&gt;EDWARDIAN???&lt;/i&gt;&quot; And then did the only thing one can do in these degenerate times: mocked it on Twitter. ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meredith, I don&#8217;t think I got past &#8220;Edwardian authoress,&#8221; to be honest. It was like *sound effect of record skipping* and I just sat there thinking, &#8220;Edwardian? <i>Edwardian?</i> <i>EDWARDIAN???</i>&#8221; And then did the only thing one can do in these degenerate times: mocked it on Twitter. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Edwardian is the new Victorian by Meredith (Austenesque Reviews)</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2013/04/19/edwardian-is-the-new-victorian/#comment-43167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meredith (Austenesque Reviews)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austenblog.com/?p=7524#comment-43167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love the very apropos Princess Bride reference!  In the article she also spelled Bennet with two T&#039;s instead of one.  Perhaps more research and proofreading is needed...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the very apropos Princess Bride reference!  In the article she also spelled Bennet with two T&#8217;s instead of one.  Perhaps more research and proofreading is needed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Edwardian is the new Victorian by Gill</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2013/04/19/edwardian-is-the-new-victorian/#comment-43165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 10:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austenblog.com/?p=7524#comment-43165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my experience I&#039;ve found most people are at least a hundred years out with when they think Jane Austen lived. When they are told 
it often makes then reassess her writing and persona .... In a positive way.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience I&#8217;ve found most people are at least a hundred years out with when they think Jane Austen lived. When they are told<br />
it often makes then reassess her writing and persona &#8230;. In a positive way&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Edwardian is the new Victorian by Edwardian is the new Victorian &#124; This Delightful Habit of Journaling</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2013/04/19/edwardian-is-the-new-victorian/#comment-43164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edwardian is the new Victorian &#124; This Delightful Habit of Journaling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 04:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austenblog.com/?p=7524#comment-43164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Cross-posted to AustenBlog. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cross-posted to AustenBlog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dearest Jane! who could have done less for her? by Mags</title>
		<link>http://austenblog.com/2013/04/12/dearest-jane-who-could-have-done-less-for-her/#comment-43163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mags]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 03:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austenblog.com/?p=7517#comment-43163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Bobby,

Thanks so much for your post! I wish I lived closer to NC so I could come and see your show--it sounds wonderful. Love the service dog worked into the play!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bobby,</p>
<p>Thanks so much for your post! I wish I lived closer to NC so I could come and see your show&#8211;it sounds wonderful. Love the service dog worked into the play!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>