AustenBlog

July 5, 2009

REVIEW: Rude Awakenings of a Jane Austen Addict by Laurie Viera Rigler

Rude Awakenings of a Jane Austen Addict by Laurie Viera Rigler“I am Miss Mansfield. Jane is my Christian name. I neither look nor sound like this. When last I went to sleep I was in my own bed, on my father’s estate in Somerset, and it was the year thirteen. 1813. Not” –and there it is, on her desk, a leather-bound book open to the frontispiece, a calendar topped by the numbers 2009. “It was not 2009. I am not ill, Dr. Menziger. I am simply lost.”

It is a fun exercise for the modern Janeite to imagine herself suddenly waking up in Jane Austen’s world—her real world, not the somewhat sanitized version presented in films of her novels. This has been fertile ground for novelists, with varying success; Laurie Viera Rigler’s previous novel, Confessions of a Jane Austen Addict, is easily the best of the crop, fresh and smart and more literate than the others. Thus we had high expectations for Rude Awakenings of a Jane Austen Addict, a companion piece in which we experience the other side of the body-switch: Jane Mansfield (yeah, we know), willowy Regency brunette maiden, waking up as shapely, blonde, 21st century and decidedly not virginal Courtney Stone. If Courtney, well-versed in Jane’s time from her Austen addiction, had difficulty adjusting, just imagine what poor Jane is feeling.

Courtney’s friends are understandably alarmed to find her dressed in the wedding gown from her recently broken engagement (the only garment in Courtney’s closet that Jane considered sufficiently modest to wear), her habit of speaking like someone in a Jane Austen novel, her insistence that she shares a name with a dead movie star, and her failure to recognize any of them, but have a convenient excuse in her accident of the day before, when she hit her head diving in a too-shallow swimming pool. But like her Regency counterpoint, Jane must explain herself to a physician and be subjected to the outrages of contemporary medicine.

Jane struggles to understand Courtney’s life, including the broken engagement (and her attraction to the perfidious ex-fiance, Frank), which reminds her uncomfortably of the circumstances of the romance she has left behind; her amazement at a woman being able to have independent employment, and the disappointing realization that Courtney’s job stinks; the way her world has simultaneously contracted from a large estate house to a one-bedroom apartment in a bad neighborhood, and at the same time has expanded to give her a job, a car, and the power to determine her own life—and her amazement at how Courtney has wasted what she considers such a gift. She is confused and bemused by an encounter with a fortune-teller—seemingly the same fortune-teller she encountered in her former life. And she’s not at all sure what to do about Wes, Courtney’s best friend, who is concerned and helpful and has the face of an angel, yet, according to the hints dropped by her girlfriends (and the memories she shares with Courtney), should not be trusted, for he had more to do with Frank’s betrayal than a friend should have had—and, Jane thinks, he would despise her if he knew that she had compromised herself with Frank, a deeply embarrassing (to Jane) circumstance inflicted on her by Courtney’s crossover memories.

Fortunately for her, Jane’s curiosity overcomes her distress at her situation. She begins to adjust and even to learn that life in modern times has its compensations: hot and cold running water, electric lights, easy transportation. As she is in Courtney’s body, muscle memory gives her the ability to swim, touch-type, and drive a car. Anything she does not understand is explained by the ever-valuable Google. Her assumptions about our world are illuminating and at times hilarious and touching, and her discovery that there are four more novels by Jane Austen than have been published in her own time—and that there are entire societies dedicated to discussing her favorite author’s work!–will give any true Janeite a shiver of sympathetic delight.

Jane comes to the realization that, like herself, Courtney was deeply unhappy with her life and wished for something different—something very different. She understands, with the help of the fortune-teller, that she has the opportunity for a fresh start, not only for Courtney but for herself, and that she must shed not only Courtney’s emotional baggage but her own to find the happiness that is truly within her reach.

Like Confessions, the author’s understanding of the Regency period informs the story beautifully without being oppressive; no infodumps, no bizarre side plots designed solely to show off that the author did a lot of research, and just enough mystery and metaphysics about the body switch to keep the reader guessing, since the “how” doesn’t matter in this story as much as the “why.” We are fooled into thinking that the setting, and the setup, is the story, but the plot goes deeper, touching on the reason why we still read Jane Austen’s novels today. It goes beyond the romance, beyond the manners, beyond even the irony and the humor and the beautiful prose: it goes to the truth that while society changes, while the trappings of life change, while the circumstances of our lives that we often take for granted change, people do not change. The human heart does not change. Love and friendship do not change. That which brings us joy and contentment does not change.

I do not know how I have come to be in this time, in this place, in this body. But I do know that any place where there are six novels by the author of Pride and Prejudice must be a very special sort of heaven.

And that is a truth universally…oh, you know.

A lucky AustenBlog reader will win a signed copy of Rude Awakenings of a Jane Austen Addict. Send an e-mail to austenblog AT gmail DOT com with your full name and mailing address by 8 p.m. Eastern time on Wednesday, July 8, and let us know what part of modern life you think would be most confusing to a Regency lady.

No Comments Yet

  1. P.S. If Sam Mendes had half a brain (and we know he must, for he married the lovely Kate Winslet), he would abandon his plans to bring a half-baked Mary Sue fan fiction like Lost in Austen to the big screen and grab these two fascinating and intelligent books with both hands. And then hire his wife to play Courtney. You’re welcome, Sam.

    Comment by Mags — July 5, 2009 @ 6:37 pm

  2. I started to read an ARC of Confessions when it came out and didn’t like it. Maybe I’ll try again. It sounds like a fun idea.

    PS – I just watched the trailer for Rigler’s book and thought it was pretty good with one big exception: the voice of the main character, not English-sounding at all. I wonder why such a big mistake would be made? Maybe it’s my ears. :-)

    Comment by jemima p — July 5, 2009 @ 7:17 pm

  3. Don’t worry about who sounds like what. I’m about half-way through “Rude Awakenings of a Jane Austen Addict. Having also read “Confessions of a Jane Austen Addict, don’t sweat the small stuff. The first was a wonderful read and the second is wonderful as well. Both books show a lot of historical research and technical background for a novel based on historical events.

    Comment by jeffrey — July 5, 2009 @ 8:04 pm

  4. “Confessions…” was far superior Austen inspired fiction to any others I’ve read. What was best was it stood by itself, it was actually a thoughtful, well structured story in it’s own right, about much more than a modern woman obsessing about Austen. Loved the way they actually talked about the rest of her books, not just P&P, that always ticks me off- how obsessed could the characters be with Austen if they’ve only read one of her books?
    For Jemima’s question about the accents; in the first book, when Courtney wakes up in 1813 she posesses the body, voice and even some mental images of Jane. That would assume that Jane had an equal swap, so she would have Courtney, a 21st century American girl’s voice.

    Comment by Serena — July 6, 2009 @ 12:47 am

  5. Do I have to read “Confessions” first before I read this one?

    Comment by Anonymous — July 7, 2009 @ 10:40 am

  6. Hi Anonymous. I don’t think it matters. Both novels deal with the struggles that the heroines endure from being mysteriously swapped, one era to another. Although I’m only about half-way through “Rude Awakenings,” I think both of Ms. Rigler’s works could stand alone on their own merits as excellent singular reads. However, once you read one, you will immediately want to read the other!

    Comment by Finetooner — July 7, 2009 @ 11:29 am

  7. I just sent my entry out, but forgot to enter the subject field! Should I resend it?

    Comment by Jamie — July 8, 2009 @ 8:00 am

  8. Jamie: Nah. I got it. :-)

    Anonymous @5: I don’t think you HAVE to read Confessions first, but I think you will enjoy Rude Awakenings more if you do.

    Comment by Mags — July 8, 2009 @ 10:12 am

  9. Although this particular topic has been discussed over on Laurie Viera Rigler’s website, her two novels would make DANDY movies! I certainly hope a producer picks up on them. “Confessions” as a starter and “Rude Awakenings” as a sequel.

    Comment by Finetooner — July 8, 2009 @ 11:35 am

  10. Just finished Confessions and loved it. If I’m not the winner of Rude Awakenings, I’m buying it online ASAP thanks to a birthday gift card. (Bookworms know that giving each other bookstore gift cards is pretty much the best present out there. LOL) Rigler is a brilliant author and I very much agree that we should have these books made into movies/mini-series.

    Comment by Rebecca — July 9, 2009 @ 5:17 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Blog at WordPress.com.